Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:41

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Is Beehiiv better than Substack?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 - TheStreet
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Bitcoin fans aren’t all sold on Trump’s meme coin - NBC News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Stephen A. Smith Responds to Viral Solitaire Photo from NBA Finals Game 4 - Bleacher Report
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
6 "Bad" Foods that Could Actually Help Lower Blood Pressure, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
WBD Shareholders Nix David Zaslav’s 2024 Pay Package In Non-Binding Vote - Deadline
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear: